It seems that segregation is not only recognized in constitutional law and judicial decision, but that it is also supported by general principles of natural law. As nature had produced different species, so it has produced different races of men. Distinguishing racial features have not been produced by men, or man-made laws. They are the result of processes of evolution and it seems natural and customary for different species and different races to recognize and prefer as intimate associates their own kind. Nature has produced white birds, black birds, blue birds and red birds, and they do not roost on the same limb or use the same nest. Such recognition and preference for their own kind prevails among other animals. It prevails among all people, among the yellow, black, and red-skinned races. The law recognizes these natural and instinctive principles and practices of life. It does not attempt to inhibit them. It would be futile to attempt to do so. This nation's experience with the Eighteenth Amendment shows that there are forces of nature that cannot be changed by constitutional amendment or judicial decree....

During recent years there has been a tendency prompted by over-zealous champions of democracy to extend democratic processes and legal procedure into fields where they are not qualified to serve. ...This tendency has been incited and increased by open champions and subversive agents of the world revolution which has been advancing under the banner of Communism. The open and avowed purposes of such revolutionaries are to eradicate all religion and to destroy our system of laws and jurisprudence....

Those who intentionally or unwittingly are overburdening democratic and legal processes and destroying the delicate balance and apportionment of powers upon which our way of life depends, play into the hands of the revolutionaries. While they may think they are championing freedom and liberalism, they are bringing about a totalitarianism which will destroy the very object they seek to serve. This court therefore concludes that segregation itself is not unconstitutional or unlawful...."

Those were the words of, believe it or not, a Federal District Judge, a native of the state of Ohio, Judge Robert N. Wilkins, in 1952. The decision rendered found against the NAACP, an organization founded, funded, and for many years actually headed -- not by Blacks whose interests it purported to serve -- but by Jews, many of them with long and documented ties to the anti-American movement described by Judge Wilkins, and which now loots America at will and defames, imprisons or kills many of those who oppose its rule. But while these revolutionists were overturning our ancient laws, most of us were asleep.

On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court of the United States decreed that racial separation in America's public schools must end, regardless of the expressed wishes of the people and the traditions of two hundred years. The court at that time was headed by a man named Earl Warren. While Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Earl Warren made friendly visits at taxpayer expense to Communist heads of state in Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia. Of six such foreign trips, five were to visit states of the Communist Bloc. So pro-Communist was the Warren Court that Communist Party spokeswoman Dorothy Healy said on June 17, 1957, of three simultaneous decisions made by the court that day dismantling anti-Communist legislation, "This is the greatest victory the Communist Party ever had."

Warren had almost no legal experience to qualify him for the position of Chief Justice of the highest court in the land, but that exalted office was his reward for supporting the takeover of the Republican Party by the forces friendly to internationalism, Zionism, and Communism who were represented by Dwight Eisenhower in 1952.

Four days after the assassination of President John Kennedy in November 1963, the Communist newspaper The Worker stated:

"We believe that President Johnson on the one hand and Congress on the other should act at once to appoint respective extraordinary investigating commissions with full power to conduct a searching inquiry into all the circumstances around the assassination of the President and the murder of the suspect. Such an investigating commission, headed by the chief Justice of the Supreme Court, should be composed of citizens and experts who enjoy the confidence of the nation."

Two days after this Communist editorial appeared, Lyndon Baines Johnson appointed the Chief Justice, Mr. Earl Warren, to head his President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, popularly known as the Warren Commission. The liepapers and the boob-tubes, for some inexplicable reason, never mentioned the facts about Warren and his background. So we all slept.

When the Warren Court handed down its decree declaring that henceforth America's schools must be racially mixed, upon what did they base their decision? Was it based upon law, precedent, or constitutional principles? No, for all of these at that time had stood steadfast during the entire prior history of this nation for separation of the races. The Warren Court's decision was based instead on the findings of self-described "experts" in the fields of psychology, sociology, and anthropology, fields which for decades had been infiltrated by aliens and traitors in the service of America's enemies. They piously testified about the great psychological harm that was being inflicted by having White schools for White children and Black schools for Black children. The "experts" were certainly right, as anyone can see by observing how much better American schools are now than in 1954. Ostensibly on the basis of these flimsy and empirically unvalidated claims, but really just in accordance with what they planned to do all along, Warren and his accomplices changed the meaning of our Constitution and sentenced millions of sweet innocent little boys and girls to a living hell and in many cases actual physical rape, torture, and death.

One of these "experts" was one Theodore Brameld, an alleged authority on psychology who was perhaps not coincidentally an acknowledged member of at least ten different Communist front and Communist-dominated organizations, and whose name often appeared in a favorable light in the columns of the Communist newspaper The Daily Worker. He was listed there as a supporter of an organization calling itself the American League for Peace and Democracy, which had formerly called itself the American League Against War and Fascism, and which was, according to the Senate Internal Security Committee, engaged "in an effort to create public sentiment on behalf of a foreign policy adapted to the interests of the Soviet Union" and which was in addition "the largest of the Communist front movements in the United States."

Another of these large-brained fellows to whom the court listened so intently was a man named E. Franklin Frazier, who had been cited by the U.S. House of Representatives for his membership in Communist organizations no fewer than 18 times. He held a leading position with the Communist magazine Social Work Today, which in its February 1942 issue gave him credit for making the magazine's progress possible. In 1949, Frazier wrote a book entitled The Negro in the United States, which was not only reviewed favorably in The Worker and the Daily People's World, but which was actually distributed by the Communist Party and advertised in its "Workers Book Shop" catalogs for 1949 and 1950. Not only E. Franklin Frazier, but his book which had been officially adopted by the Communist Party, USA, were cited as authorities by the United States Supreme Court in their judicial decision outlawing racial separation in the public schools.